ENVIROZONE PILOT STUDY
Executive Summary

April 28, 1999

(This executive summary is prepared by EOT's management based on a comprehensive report prepared jointly by EOT and EBMUD's staff. The full report is going through final review.)

Envirozone Technologies (EOT) Advanced Oxidation Process (AOP) 1000-GPM pilot plant is operating at EBMUD on its fifth phase which started April 1, 1999.

This Executive Summary covers the period of operation from September 16, 1998 to March 31, 1999.

The system was designed to treat secondary effluent wastewater at the EBMUD Main Wastewater Treatment Plant for disinfection and the oxidation of complex organic compounds. The process utilizes the synergistic effect of the combination of ozone and ultra violet irradiation.

The following are highlights of the test:

Fecal Coliform
Test results showed that two minute of treatment time with 10-PPM ozone followed by treatment of either low pressure or medium pressure UV irradiation, consistently met (or better than) the regulatory discharge requirement.

Inorganic Compounds
COD, TSS and nitrites were analyzed. EOT's treatment achieved a reduction in Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Suspended Solids (TTS) and Nitrite. EOT's process reduced nitrite up to 81% while EBMUD's treatment (with sodium hypochlorite and sodium bi-sulfite) showed 3096% increase.

Complex Organic Compounds
There are 207 regulated compounds that were tested for during the study. There were approximately 30 that were detected, Out of those, the emphasis was placed on 18 compounds. These were divided into three groups that were selected for further analysis:

  • Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
  • Semi-volatile organic compounds (semi-VOCs)
  • Organophosphorous pesticides

There were 18 complex organic compounds that were detected in the wastewater and impacted by the Envirozone process. Of these 18 compounds, 14 were decreased in concentration by EOT process, four showed an increase, which is an oxidation-by-product, that may be reduced or eliminated by further oxidation.

A significant achievement of this process is a 30% reduction of MtBE in the effluent. This petroleum additive was further reduced by 70% after three closed circulation cycles.

The compounds that were selected are listed below.

Organic Compound

Organic Compound Class

EPA Method

Concentration Change

1,4 Dichlorobenzene

VOCs and Semi-VOCs

624/625

Decrease

2-Butanone

VOCs

624

Increase

2,4,6-Trichlorophenol

Semi-VOCs

625

Decrease

Acetone

VOCs

624

Increase

Benzoic Acid

Semi-VOCs

625

Increase

Carbon Disulfide

VOCs

624

Decrease

CIS-1,2-Dichloroethene

VOCs

624

Decrease

Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE)

VOCs

624

Decrease

Tetrachloroethene

VOCs

624

Decrease

Toluene

VOCs

624

Decrease

Trichloroethene

VOCs

624

Decrease

Note: Some compounds are analyzed by more than one laboratory method.

EBMUD's disinfection with sodium hypochlorite/sodium bi-sulfite had minor impact, as compared to EOT, on the reduction of complex organic compounds that were detected in the wastewater. However, EOT's process showed significant decreases in the same compounds. Both treatments showed increases in three (harmless) compounds (Acetone, Benzoic acid and 2-butanone). These are considered as disinfection by products which can be reduced or eliminated by extending the ozone/UV oxidation treatment.

ECONOMICS & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS

The EOT treatment improved the quality of the effluent. It reduced colors, deodorized, disinfected and reduced complex organic compounds, thereby provided higher quality effluent to San Francisco Bay. Without further treatment, the effluent could be suitable for irrigation and other agricultural uses plus many other industrial uses such as concrete mixes, equipment and aircraft washing.

With micro-filtration and Reverse Osmosis (R.O.) if needed, the effluent could meet drinking water standards.

The economic impact of EOT's process makes it very attractive for any discharge or use. For example, it would cost a ratepayer $3. per year extra for discharging a much cleaner effluent into the San Francisco Bay. Estimated operation and maintenance costs, including depreciation, are 6-8 U.S. cents/1000 Gallons (EBMUD's estimate for 55,000--GPM system)

The present 1000-GPM pilot plant estimated operational cost including depreciation is $0.30/1000 Gallons (based on system maximum use of power of 51-KWh. Capital cost is based on $2.2 million with 20-year depreciation. Energy cost at 4.5 U.S cents/KW, 24 hours /day operation).